Main Page | Recent changes | View source | Page history

Printable version | Disclaimers | Privacy policy

Not logged in
Log in | Help

Goodridge v. Massachusetts

From dKosopedia

November 18, 2003

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the exclusion of same-sex couples from civil marriage in unconstitutional under the equality and liberty provisions of the Massachusetts Constitution. (“[W]e conclude that the marriage ban does not meet the rational basis test for either due process or equal protection.”)

To remedy this constitutional violation, the Court stated “We construe civil marriage to mean the voluntary union of two persons as spouses, to the exclusion of all others. This reformulation redresses the plaintiffs' constitutional injury and further the aim of marriage to promote stable, exclusive relationships.” It also added, “[E]xtending civil marriage to same-sex couples reinforces the importance of marriage to individuals and communities. That same-sex couples are willing to embrace marriage's solemn obligations of exclusivity, mutual support, and commitment to one another is a testament to the enduring place of marriage in our laws and in the human spirit.” For the complete text of the Goodridge decision see: Decision text

Retrieved from "http://localhost../../../g/o/o/Goodridge_v._Massachusetts_fa42.html"

This page was last modified 23:17, 15 April 2006 by dKosopedia user Allamakee Democrat. Based on work by dKosopedia user(s) ZenobiaDTC. Content is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

[Main Page]
Daily Kos
DailyKos FAQ

View source
Discuss this page
Page history
What links here
Related changes

Special pages
Bug reports